Monday, December 1, 2014

"Gayaneshagowa"



Long before the European invasion, Native American’s were theoretically the first settlers of America continent.
Basic theories about how they settled at the first place.
          ·         Exotic proposition
          ·         Scientific proposition
However, there is not any convincing evidence.
“The fact that native people inhabited in America long before the European invasion must be essential in decision making of the U.S. government.”
There are three different government systems among native tribes
          ·         Original indigenous governments
          ·         Contemporary constitutional governments
          ·         Transitional constitutional governments.
“Many of indigenous governments (in time) metamorphosed from original to transitional to contemporary.”

Original Indigenous Governments
There are indigenous governments still exhibit original and traditional structures, which are linked directly to ancient times and often are settlers from the North America continent (of course with some adoptions).

Language represents native culture as well as the diversity in natives. In North America, there are twelve quite distinct and unrelated linguistic groups.

Europeans categorized Indians into three
       ·         The missionary
       ·         The Machiavellian
       ·         The classical

“During colonial period, the protocols and ceremonies of Native people’s language of diplomacy were rarely European BECAUSE the hierarchical-feudal system of European diplomacy was not translated well on natives.”

The Iroquois Confederacy

The Haudenosaunee (Iroquois League) – formed b/ AD 1000-1500 – in present days, they are located upstate New York and part of Canada.



       ·         The most sophisticated and the most powerful indigenous government
       ·         Developed the 1th Federal Constitution on the American Continent
       ·         Established the democratic ideas and principles of initiative, recall, referendum, equal suffrage, checks and balances, specific delegations of war and peace responsibilities.
       ·         The idea of being foster unity (probably) influenced American democratic thought.



The central governing unit was the Council that has 50 seats filled by chiefs,
(The internal sovereignty of each nation was respected)
       ·         The Older Brothers: The Mohawk (9) and the Seneca (8)
       ·         The Younger Brothers: The Oneida (9) and the Cayuga (10)
       ·         Keepers of the Fire: the Onondaga (14)




Historic values and Traits
Particular aboriginal values and structural traits helped the system of governance to be stronger.
         1)     The idea of kinship group or household 
         2)     The idea that individual or personal autonomy
         3)     Emotional-spiritual-physical connection to homeland
         4)     (Nearly) no separation b/ political world and spiritual world
         5)     Sovereignty vested in the community
         6)     Males – political leader positions, females – the center of aboriginal social life and political organizations
         7)     The primary thrust of aboriginal government – more judicial

Transitional Constitutional Governments

Indian Reorganization Act Governments in 1930 mostly known as the contemporary constitutional governments. In 1800’s even if there were a number of traditional Native Governments, which survived, they were spoiled in the end of the century. It has three reasons:
-          Contact with European culture
-          Removal and placement of tribes
-          Establishment of the powerful Indian Agent system by the federal government.

(Only a few groups and most notably Pueblos achieved to escape to this spoil and keep their traditional government)

The Pueblos & other indigenous people in the Southwest have faced different degree of embodiment by 4 state societies:
-Meso-American states societies
-Spain
-Mexico
-The U.S

The Cherokee : A Case Study

Their common cultural traditions shaped their lives. Because of their ethnic heritage, there was no government and people generally governed by clan laws and town councils. There were 3 factors was founded to not have a central government of Cherokees:

1-factional conflicts
2-linguistic troubles
3-historical tradition

When whites entered their territory they bring disease and changes such as trade goods, missionaries and competition among European states. One scholar said that : “ …in the first three decades of the 19th century , Cherokee reorganized their economy  and political structure. Farming  and animal husbandry replaced fur trading as the most important economic activities…”(p60) By 1827,the Cherokee had accepted a republican style of government with a bicameral legislature and a court system.

-Indian Removal Act – “Trail of Tears”



Other Tribes in Transition

On the Navajo Reservation, John G. Hunter developed a local government , which also called as a “ chapter government”. In this government they became together to discuss local issues like irrigation, livestock improvements and agriculture. Chapters were local organizations, composed and directed by people who share common interests.


Contemporary constitutional governments
This part talks about the congressional investigations about the living conditions of Indians. These investigations challenged the federal Indian Policy. Of course with the direction of John Collier who is the head of BIA. The aim was to reconstruct tribal governments and the improvement of economic life, resources and some basic civil rights.
One example is Leavitt Act of July 1, 1932 which dealt with Indian irrigation projects. And some other acts dealt with other different issues as you can see on page 62.

The Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) of June 30,1934 was one of the most important federal laws ever enacted in so far Indians are concerned.
Now to talk about the IRA, according to Senator Burton Wheeler, IRA had some basic purposes and benefits like stopping limiting reservations, providing land for landless Indians, allowing tribes to organize their own business corporations, establishing financial credits and employment in BIA.
But the section 16 was the most crucial: It gave Indian tribes, which live on the same reservation, rights to organize its own common welfare and a chance to adopt a constitution and by-laws.
IRA gave 1 year to tribes to vote on the provisions. In 1935 they gave another year but the problem was, they could only vote once and couldn’t change their decision. In the end, 181 tribes accepted and 77 rejected.
However, there were 3 controversies. 1 the IRA was to be considered adopted if the majority of Indians didn’t vote against its application. So they had to vote against it. Who did not vote was counted as yes. 2 the act followed one-time vote for entire reservations but more than one ethnic tribal nation inhabited a single reservation and it lead to a confederated status of a number of tribes. So the preexisting governing structures collapsed into a single constitutional type government. 3 there was a problem with the order. The question was whether a tribe had to have land before it could adopt a constitution or weather a constitution could be approved with the land transferred later.
Because of the disorganization of indigenous governments during the previous decades and the Western constitutional approach, the newly revived tribes could not always put parameters for their own governments. Also any amendments of the tribes were also subject to the approval of the secretary of the interior. So we can see the domineering presence of BIA.
We see that the native nations struggled in the late 30’s and 40’s. Then comes the termination period of 1950s. in this period, law makers sought to eliminate reservations and accelerated the assimilation of Indians. A number of tribes, bands & California rancherias were terminated although it was a short-lived period. By the mid 1960s the termination continued to haunt tribes.
What native nations going through beside the fear of termination was poverty, poor education, poor health conditions, inadequate housing conditions and lack of communication facilities. Mamie Mizen (who is a staff member of the Senate Appropriations Committee) wrote annual reports that showed how difficult life was on reservations in all-socioeconomic aspects. 
Important happenings which are The Area Redevelopment Act, Economic Opportunity Act, Great Society Welfare programs, Civil Rights Movement and the Red Power Activism lead tribes involving in the federally funded programmes.
To be eligible for federal programs like Area Redevelopment Act tribes had to assure the federal agencies that they would administer the funs impartially and without the difference of rage, ethnicity and gender.
In 1968 Congress enacted the Indian Civil Rights Act which imposed certain constitutional norms to reservation residents. But of course the rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and 14th amendment were inapplicable because of their preexisting sovereign status. And one primary purpose was to protect individual rights of all persons on the reservations. 

STRUCTURES& FUNCTIONS 0F CONTEMPORARY CONSTITUTONAL GOVERNMENTS

  IRA had no effect on stabled Powers in the native nation. But added some powers and recognition of those Powers that the tribes were allowed to be exercised without the approval of the secretary.
Ø  The Powers were: Right to veto about the tribal funds or assets,
Ø  The inheret Powers were contained of;  recognition of a tribe’s right to choose from it’s own goverment
Ø  Fort Peck Reservation
Ø  It was a reservation that activated in the congress of 1888, at home of the two bloody enemy Indian nations.  Assiniboine and Yanktonai Sioux. What they’ve done by Fort Peck was to put two tribes in the same area and force them to live within the borders of the reservation. So, they began to compete with each other.
Ø  At 1927, both of the tribes were adopted a constitution and formed a general council legislative body that allowed the entire electorate to debate. At 1934, they rejected IRA, due to the previous constitution
Navajo Nation’s president system There was a system in all Indian Courts executive function.  Navajo nation had adopted the president system. Navajo nation had a chief of execution whom called ‘Tribal Chairman’ until 1989.  Due to the chaos and political disorders, they changed the system of organic and tribal codes to put them into amandmends in order to give more power to the president. These amendments created the president and his position.
Crow Tribal Court (judicial)The Crow tribal court was a creation of the tribe’s legislative body. The general council lacked clear independence. The court based on a 3 member court, judges elected by the general council’s membership, they serve 4 years.
Tribal Councils( legislative)There were 3 board functions that nations used when it comes to law and politics, which were the tribal council, tribal chair and tribal court. Every tribe had an executive & legislative branch but some lacked judicy. In most nations, council members served 2-4 years and they were required to satisfy the services in the elected councils. Some of the duties were;Establish justice and provide tranquillity. Councils were also given powers, different than duties, one example of the power was Money and funds.
Tribal Chairs (executive) All tribal constitutions provide for a chair person.The chair in the tribals performed the executive function of the tribal gov. which involves the Daily operations of the administrations and decisions about the system.  The chair was the head of the goverment and his powers defined by the law and tribal constitutions. The chair also gains his power ;from the traditions and the prestige of the position.  His duty was to; negotiate and hold meetings with BIA. The chair was chosen by the council’s vote or by the electrorate.
 Tribal Courts (judicial) In contemprorary era, judicial was used more than legislative in nature. Their system was based on harmony and balance. Tribes had their very own system of lawn and power long ago they met Europeans and americans. The force of the assimilation made them to change their styles.
Traditional Courts: Used mostly at the 20th century to avoid from violance and reconcile for civil disputes. Courts mostly consists of ;Elders,Tribal chief,Religious leader and a warrior leader. These courts were handled, misbehaviour ,loss or restriction. At the end, they forget and kept living on harmony.
Courts of Indian Offenses These courts established in early 1880. They operate under the guidance of the code of federal regulations. The main aim of the courts was to educate Indians with the Euro-American way, and operated it through the 2/3 of the Indian reservations. Therefore Indians became individuals when it came to property. So this ‘education’ caused problems inside the nation. Today there are 20 CFR courts.
Modern Tribal Courts Tribal constitutions which organized under the IRA. Many tribal constitutions contained language, idea and other aspects which were away from tradition.  treated different to every nation while not providing any seperation among them. ICRA and U.S’s Bill Of Rights pushed the tribal judges more in a direction that resembles non-Indian courts. As a result, tribal courts had gained many of the Western ways and they’ve ‘modernized’. Yet there are important differences between tribal courts and non-Indian courts; Their judges mostly receive legal training from NAICJA, since they had ‘colonial’ origin, they must create the balance between tribal members and tribal councils.
In 1993, Indian Tribal Justice Act created and authorized the federal gov. About developing the justice systems. Indians experienced double violence than non-Indians experienced in USA. Between 25-34 aged Indians, the rate of violent crime victimization was more than the other hate crimes and they usually got attacked by the white.  They got support from organizations such as Low Enforcement Assistant Administrations. Interpreting into one to another is the ability of these courts.


Alaska National Governmental Organizations


Alaska Natives, which include American Indians, Inuit and Aleut had very little contact with whites before or even after Russia left Alaska to the U.S. in 1867. With the Indian Naturalization Act of 1924, they included the Eskimo, Aleut and Indians of the Alaska territory. The purpose was, Eskimos and other aboriginal people from Alaska considered as Indians.

-Tee –Hit-Ton v. United States Alaskan Natives started to lose their land because government seen their land as “unrecognized”.
-The Alaska Statehood Act of 1958 –authorization of 108 million acres of public land, hunting & fishing territory was based on Alaska’ admission as a state.
-Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) 1971 – Alaskan Natives had a claim to have of all land in Alaska, surface and subsurface, which based on their aboriginal use and occupancy of it.

Issues Confronting Native Government
Tribal governments have often faced pressure to modify or the prospect of legal termination BECAUSE of federal dominance.
The courts, the Congress, the President, the BIA, state governments…

Politics of Scarcity – extreme social problems and economic poverty pushes to seek eternal help; reliance on outside help: compliance with outside regulations and acceptance of other forms of interference

Politics of Interference – socioculturally based: within the tribal membership; governmentally based: from the outside









                                                                          ***

In Civilize Them With a Stick ,Mary Brave Bird talks about how Indian Boarding Schools affected many Indian Children making them helpless ,defenseless and trying very hard to survive. Almost like Nazi concentration camp and some children even tried to kill themselves. These schools' main purpose was about assimilation of Indians into and be a part of society.





Questions to think about !

*we all learned about the acts and projects that 'aimed' to help natives, then comes the termination period leading native tribes to be terminated. Do you think this is surprising? If not, why do you think the U.S. government gave some kinds of hopes to Natives?

* why do you think Americans tried to assimilate Indian children using boarding schools considering Mary Brave Bird's text, what would you if you were one of Indian children?










Works Cited
*Bird, Mary Brave. "Civilize Them with a Stick." (1990). Print
*Wilkins, David Eugene. "Indigenous Governments Past,Present,and Future." American Indian Politics & the American Political System. 51-82. Print.
*"Mary Brave Bird." Native North American Biography Edited by Sharon Malinowski and Simon Glickman. Web. 30 Nov. 2014. <http://www.manataka.org/page416.html>.



THANK YOU !

                                                                                                             Kardelen-İrem-Selen-İlkim

49 comments:

  1. Thank you İlkim, İrem, Selen and Kardelen for this informative presentation. The videos were great!

    Native Americans were a topic that I did not know in detail. I knew about the Indian Removal Act and how they survived the oppression of whites. Nevertheless, I didn't know that we should not call them Indians. That lead me to think African Americans and the wide-known knowledge about not to use the word 'negro' while referring to African Americans. The sensitivity towards the Native Americans is not strong enough when compared to African Americans. This fact is related to what we have discussed in the lectures and during the presentation. We said that US government is obsessed about classifying minorities. Who is "real Indian or not" is very important for them for the desire of Native resources. The conflict about this is that US government do not expect any other racial or ethnic group to look like 'authentic'; yet for being able to gain the eligibility right for land, a Native American should look like the movie characters depicting the authentic Native Americans with long braided hair such as the hair of the man in the last and the saddest video we watched.

    While talking about the last video I want to add something. This video, even though it was only 5 minutes, had a lot about to say concerning the effects of boarding schools. Boarding schools is a SICK technique to assimilate the children into the American way of life; under the cover title of "civilization". It leads to lifelong traumas. Mary Bird uses the term "kidnapping" for what US government officials did to the children in the boarding schools. (404) It is the PERFECT term for this terribly evil system. Jennifer's comment about the mind of the executives of the boarding schools and how they find this system appropriate sharpened the concept of how corrupted a human mind can be. The man in the video uses the term "terrible shame" for the things that have done to him and other boarding school children. Certainly right, it is a TERRIBLE SHAME! Nobody should have a right to domain another person's natural rights. The ones who executed the boarding schools thought of their culture in such superior terms that the executives acted as if they have the right to do whatever they want to Native Americans. " Only good Indian is a dead Indian" or " Kill the Indian to save the man" are so meaningless that these cannot be coming from a human; but might be coming from a cucumber or a bathroom wall tile. As House says about the human brain " If you have one, try to use it please!"

    Personally, I have been very much interested in the Iroquois culture since my junior year. Iroquois confederacy constituted of the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca. I know that they always had some contradictions between each other but it never lead them having permanent damages. As we have said in the class, the real damage came from the US government. Legislations, restrictions, extermination and termination were attempts to get rid of Native Americans. In my perspective, Iroquois culture is really interesting and recently I have watched a documentary about their oral history and another video about the life in the long house:

    http://watchdocumentary.org/watch/americas-first-nations-video_ce0c3e4e3.html

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIs3aiFrTQc ---> long house video

    After seeing the photographs of Tom Torino and his transmission, I did some digging into other transmissions after the boarding school life. Here is a website including some texts and photographs about this certain subject:

    http://aam.wcu.edu/projects/beck/activities.htm

    Bige YILMAZ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These are great links, Bige! Thanks for sharing them. Your analysis of the topic is right on. You captured the main contradiction in US Federal Indian policies when you wrote: "The conflict about this is that US government do not expect any other racial or ethnic group to look like 'authentic'; yet for being able to gain the eligibility right for land, a Native American should look like the movie characters depicting the authentic Native Americans with long braided hair such as the hair of the man in the last and the saddest video we watched." And I agree with you about the brutality of boarding schools. Similar schools were also created for Mexican Americans in the southwest in the early 20th century as part of a process of "Americanization" that attempted to eradicate Spanish using often very brutal methods by teachers who thought they were doing something right...You are correct to point out that many atrocities are often committed in the name of some greater good. But still human rights are violated and people die.

      Delete
  2. Thanks for the presentation.

    Don’t you just love the amount of hypocrisy and irony in American history? Comparing the ideals and the reality of the political and societal institutions of both the Native American communities and the United States itself, one can only laugh at the sheer absurdity that surfaces. For instance, despite the fact that the US has been and still is deploying the tired narrative of democracy to justify its actions –even in Iraq of all places-, I’d argue that some of the native tribes of the land have always had a much better functioning form of it, one that included women as well.

    I remember writing on the topic (The status of women in native societies) and the level of equality they achieved is simply mind-boggling*. There are cases where women decided on matters of war and peace or even directly shaped war tactics, things you’d consider men’s business in Europe –or Asia for that matter. (Ironically, women seemed to have had a much larger role in ancient warfare than they do in medieval or modern wars, but that’s another topic entirely.)

    (* to make sure, it really depends on the tribe as well and the historical context should be kept in mind. It’s not really like men and women were absolutely and totally equal, but they were really close to that. So yeah.)

    Or take a look at the Enlightenment era (considering it also effected the US) for yet another irony, which started before the Declaration of Independence and was still a rather influential form of thinking after it. At least on paper it pretty much declared war on the tendency to follow tradition, something the native tribes still have very strong ties to. Yet, I find it really hard to think of, say, 5 other countries that value tradition as much as the US does. (Considering the picture you used under the subtitle “Contemporary constitutional governments”, it really is not that different than any picture with US veterans in it, wearing their service uniforms.)

    Coming back to the topic at hand, it’s really sad how the natives had been treated during the time period analyzed. The entire thing reminds me of a quote by Julius Caesar:

    “War gives the right of the conquerors to impose any conditions they please upon the vanquished.“

    I have no idea if it’s just an observation of his (which I hope it is, I admire the guy) or a justification for the conqueror’s actions. In either case, I guess history does indeed repeat itself quite a lot. It’s not just despicable, the way the United States have been treating the natives, but fills me with anger as well. What’s even worse is that the ones deciding on and carrying out these sort of plans and acts do so by thinking they are serving their country –and even helping the natives, yay! Land of the free my ass.

    Prior to this week, I had no idea that the Bill of Rights didn’t apply to them. Makes me wonder if taxation did. After all, one way to look at it is that it is the tax you pay that enfranchises you with the rights you enjoy. (I do have a feeling that if a Native American purchased a truck –to give an extremely American example-, he would pay the same amount of tax. Think I’ll look into this, might be interesting.)
    Considering all this, perhaps the mythical contrast shouldn’t be drawn between the Europeans/Americans and the noble savage but rather the natives and the well-dressed savage. Notice how the neutral sounds so positive and highly when put this way.

    That Iroquois wampum looks too damn cool by the way. Turns out some American companies even made phone covers with the design. Yet another irony, huh?

    -Murat A.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now, all that was written in regards to the presentation given on Tuesday. I’d like to make a few amendments to cover the Thursday addendum as I enjoyed it thoroughly.

      I always say that it’s really important to put faces to the stories we hear and read about… and boy, did that last video put faces to hundreds of thousands of stories. Truth be told, I have absolutely nothing to add to it. The existence of the video alone says a lot and I really appreciate the fact that you decided to show it in class.

      Despite the facts that many Native Americans nowadays find themselves in poverty, and that their communities have extremely high rates of disease, alcoholism and crime; I find it really inspiring how strong some of the people we’ve watched looked. Having had an absolutely terrible beginning to their lives and not seeing much improvement along the way, some can still, somehow, manage to look happy and spirited. (And here I am, getting depressed when it rains.)

      By the way, somehow on YouTube, and while listening to music, I found out that some natives find it offensive that their headdress is used for entertainment purposes. Turns out it wasn’t just something they wore to battle but had to deserve back in the day and the process involved a series of rituals. Sort of like knighthood, I guess. Something to keep in mind while shopping for a Halloween costume.

      -Murat A.

      Delete
    2. EXACTLY--you can relate your comments on the wearing of headresses as costumes to the video Yellow Apparel: How the the Coolie Became Cool as another example of cultural commodification. If we had more time, we we would read another set of readings which also deal with how white Americans exercise power of Native peoples in particular by appropriating and commodifying aspects of their culture (from selling "sweat lodge" retreats to selling dream catchers and other symbols of sacred Native cultures to people to decorate themselves or their homes with). Again, it's all about power: who has the power to appropriate from whom? Who appropriates and who gets appropriated? And maybe that goes back to your quote from Caesar and the conquered and the vanquished.

      I'd also be curious to here where you learned about gender in Native societies. What class was that? You are absolutely right that there was a great diversity in how tribes organized themselves along gender lines and roles, but we do see powerful examples of female leadership and equality in many indigenous societies. Some indigenous societies even believed in the concept of "two-spirited" people, who were both male AND female and they were considered sacred and important members of the community. Some scholars understand "two-spirited" peoples as what we were today classify as "queer" or "gay" people.

      Thoughtful and heartfelt comments, MA. Thanks for sharing.

      Delete
  3. Thank you ladies for this great and thoughtful presentation! :) I loved your presentation and videos so so much. I really like reggae music style and I really loved the video “Skrillex & Damian "Jr. Gong" Marley - Make It Bun Dem”. I also felt sad for the video which is in the end. Your presentation strikes me a lot.

    First of all Native American people struggled for peace and we understand this from “Gayaneshagowa(The Great Law of Peace)”. I also felt so sad about “Indian Boarding School” it is so tragic for Native American children and this is a big suffering for children. I felt so sorry for them and I think that it is difficult to describe with words. Native American people are assimilated and it is a cultural assimilation. There is an outsider racialization and there is a big question which is “where do Native Americans fit in racial triangulation?”

    It is true that Native Americans have an original culture and they have spiritual beliefs but those were tried to be destroyed and it is so sad and their language has been tried to change. Throughout the history, it is possible to see that how Native Americans suffered a lot from cultural and linguistic discrimination. For example “Indian Removal Act” was a law and it was passed by Congress in May 28, 1830 during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. There is a domination of white people. I think that it is an unfair act and actually America was Native Americans homeland too and there was an extinction of Native American people.

    Moreover, You talked about one of my favorite movies which is One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. “Chief” is my favorite character and he is telling his own story and his journey toward sanity. I think that he is like is father and although he is a big man physically, he feels small and desperate. I love this character so much.

    Finally, so are Native Americans civilized or savage people? Many people believed that they can be assimilated into White culture but they have their own historical traditions and they also have “rain dance” :) I love “rain dance” so much, it is so original. I think that “blood quantum” thing does not make any sense. There is a question that “how much Indian blood in you?” According to government, blood is a vehicle for transmission of culture and it is biological definition of identity. I think that it is so offensive and it can be said that it is a biological racism.

    -Ezgi Doğan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, you are right that blood quantum is another example of biological racism--the idea that concepts that we understand to be socially constructed--are considered to be inherent and transferrable through genetics. Also, we shouldn't forget that when we talk about indigenous peoples, we should always talk about multiple "cultures", as there wasn't one indigenous society in North American before conquest--there was an incredible diversity of different cultures.

      Delete
  4. It is pretty clear that the U.S. did want Native Americans to get out of their way to have the whole east side of the United istates. Thanks to industrialization in early 19th century, America now got steam engines which increased the scale of industry and big cities for manufacturing, finance and trade because of the improvements in industry examples of which were that railroads, telephones, skscrapers and elevated railroad. Not only the eastern cities but also cities like Chicago were improving into the great meatpacking center and due to railroads it was easy to travel around the country. In 1858, while the living conditions of the United States were improving with industry while many Native Americans were starving.Due to starvation, some tribes who lived in their reserved lands without any supply for a while, got angry. Dakota people were one of these tribes. 38 of them were executed because they burned some farms. Doesn't Americans' greed shock you every time you read a historical document? I mean they had almost the whole east side, but nooo! they needed the whole continent. The main problem is how they act as if they are the natives and the Native Americans are the invaders. After these executions, US did not stop with Dakotas but attacked also other tribes till the creation of the word "Indian problem" and the formation of IRA. these people believed that Native Americans can be like them if only they were civilized. So the founder of Carlisle Indian Boarding School, Richard Henry Pratt came up with an idea "Kill the Indian and save the man" which meant the only way to save Indians was by assimilating them by Christianizing, making them forget their own traditions, changing their clothes and not letting them speak in any Native language. I'm interested in Native American literature so in my second year, I was studying Zitkala-Sa's short stories. She was born in South Dakota and sent to a boarding school. After her education, she even worked in Carlisle but since she thought that these jobs were separating her from her family and people, she quitted. In her short stories, she describes her childhood in a tribe who lives in a reserved land, she describes her traditions and beliefs and she talks about boarding school. I will mention only the boarding school one which is "The School Days of an Indian Girl". In a nutshell, according to Zitkala-Sa’s representation, children were like they are hypnotized by red apple. All they can think that there were big red apples and the boarding schools were much better than their own countries. She also says how people look at Native American children in the train and pointing their fingers towards them(for a small girl to realize and feel uncomfortable about that is a really big thing). She says that even though she thought that she would be happy, she was not actually happy at all and the way they placed her to a table full of food because of her tears shows that white people did not understand them at all. She was sad because of realization that they were not a part of White’s culture and her dreams were just illusions about red apples. Red apple was a trick. If she ate it, she would be no longer that little girl whose hair was long and makes her feel freedom.
    After our class on Thursday, I just remembered it. I think it is a really useful inside of boarding schools since even though she also writes a fiction, some of her writings are autobiographical. I just wanted to share that.
    -Ezgi ULUSOY

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As a response (as if the whole paragraph above was not :D) I think there is no limit to Americans' greed (I say Americans but who I mean are only those who believe they have the right to rule the world since they are the perfect society and the best example while being the worst example). And the Blood Quantum is as absurd as one drop rule. I mean none is 100% anything. Whenever I read that Americans exclude someone, I found it so funny. How American are they to ask others how Black or Native American they are? Even their idea of states come from the Iroquois Nation. If Natives are so uncivilized and not good enough, why are you using their system? Europeans' way of classification was also really offensive and show their smugness. Who do you seriously think you are? I don't know I just get really angry with them when I think about past and Native Americans, even though I love American culture and people. Anyway I think I wrote a lot but not sure if I said enough. Thank you again girls.

      -Ezgi ULUSOY

      Delete
    2. Thanks for sharing the information about Zitkala-Sa--I have never heard of her or her writings. I will definitely check her out for my summer readings. Also, you added a very important piece of larger historical context to Indian Removal: the growing industrialization of the USA at the time, which also fueled and enabled expansion (along with the ideology of Manifest Destiny). Thanks for reminding of us of this important historical context.

      Delete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi guys,

    First of all thanks for the detailed historical background about Native American People and for providing a broad legal framework. I recently discovered that the more I learn about the history of Native People the more I notice the real history of them is veiled in secrecy all the time. Living the history is one thing and learning about is another. I enjoyed your presentation most when you focused on the real history and narratives of the Native People who personally experienced the challenging circumstances. The last video was really sad, but without living the same, it is hard to speak upon one’s injuries, especially if these injuries are still severe, or in Anzaldúa’s words if there still is an “open wound” constantly bleeding. We saw the stolen childhood of old people while dealing with the texts of this week by way of your presentation. It feels like a murder according to me. I’ve heard that our childhood is like our homeland. In order to have a sense of belonging, we need to have favorable memories that we want to remember often. And I feel like nothing can cure the injuries of the past and nothing can be a remedy for a lost childhood.

    Last week we read the speech of Andrew Jackson (which was more like a threat to Native tribes rather than an augural speech which embraces the public as a whole). Also in response to his speech we dealt with another document which was written by Elias Boudinot, who was excerpted from the Cherokee in 1829. Andrew Jackson’s speech is full of hypocrisy according to me. The tone of the speech is violent because in every occasion it takes the form of a challenge to the ones who were not willing to recognize the sovereignty of the State. Jackson also tries to justify his aim by adopting an insincere manner towards Native People. It really is tragic when we consider how the land, which is sacred, was stripped of the hands of Native People by unilateral rescissions of the White.

    Another interesting document that I have read on this issue was about the speech of Tecumseh, the leader of Tippecanoe tribe who emphasizes the importance of the ideal about common ownership of the land in Native culture. Although, the leaders of some tribes claimed that they had sold several lands to some white people, the owner of those lands was Tecumseh in the name of his fellow people as he mentions in his letter to governor of the Indiana Territory. Thus, the selling out was illegal according to him and he called for an immediate retreat from these lands by white people. However, as a result of the possession of power and lack of morality, a bunch of white people under the command of the governor first killed Tecumseh and then claimed the ownership of these aforementioned lands as we all know.

    Also we all know that even before Europeans reached the Continent, there were conflicts among tribes. But even so, they had their own principles with regard to war and sovereignty issues. Once European settlers aimed at laying claims to their lands, the only rule started to reign, redundant violence mixed with cultural and military slaughter. The desire to expand westward – in the name of “Manifest Destiny” – was tried to substantiate with Native People’s not being civilized. However, with time some of these tribes reached a similar way of civilization parallel to what was demanded from them by white people. They also formed their own sovereign territories. But, of course the real reason was closely related to financial desires and to the satisfaction of needs of a white society which started to experience growth after the Independence. More land was needed and a new pretext disguised as “to bring civilization”.

    So thanks again for reminding us the REAL history

    Deniz

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Deniz--thank you for contributing to interdisciplinarity by bringing in readings and information from other courses to contribute to the conversations we are having here. I appreciate the enrichment and diversity of information and perspectives this provides. This line from your post will stick with me: "real history of them is veiled in secrecy"--very elegantly and aptly put. Thanks for sharing.

      Delete
  7. Thanks for presentation, it must have been very difficult to deal with because this is very interesting topic but includes a very wide information about the Native Americans. The videos were perfect.

    I think within the races or ethnic groups that faced problems of racism and assimilation, Native Americans faced the most cruel assimilation because they were not like some others who migrated to US because of pull or push factors, or because of slavery but went through the assimilation in their own land that caused lost of identity, language, cultural values and traditions. Nevertheless, they were in space and darkness at social sphere for a long time as the racial place of Native Americans were the biggest question even if they were believed to be ones that could be integrated to the society by assimilation. I think boarding schools were nothing but mass production of identity that is suitable to so called civilised society and nothing could explain the phrase “kill the Indian and save the man” as good as boarding schools.

    I really wonder why Native Americans forced to migrate during the winter. Of course there were some strategical reasons but were they left to death intentionally?

    HASAN BAYRAM

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's very important that you identify that Native peoples have a different experiences from other minorities who immigrate because of push vs pull factors or African Americans, who were brought as slaves. These different historical experiences put different groups on different racial trajectories in the USA. We shouldn't lose sight of the comparative nature of race & ethnicity in the USA.

      Delete
  8. Thank you girls for the presentation, you covered a lot of stuff about Native Americans.


    Native Americans have always been an appealing subject to me probably because we do not have enough information about how they were living before the Europeans invaded the continent. We all know that Native Americans were living in where we know today as the US, and they had their own tribes, their own governmental structures. Iroquois Confederacy, for example, as you pointed out on your blog “was the most sophisticated and the most powerful indigenous government.” They had democratic ideas within the government as well as the righteousness and the great law as sections for their confederation. This shows us that they were able to maintain an order in an organized way but what the government wanted to do is to assimilate them. Native people were sent to boarding-schools because the US government wanted them speak English, be Christians, and to look like an American. The photo that you showed in the classroom, the change of a Native man after he was sent to the boarding school tells us what happened to their culture as we see that he was not look like a Native American anymore(he had shorter hair, no bear or mustache and his clothes were totally different from his traditional outlook).


    Of course assimilation was not the only bad thing that happened to Native Americans because we also know that The Indian Removal Act caused a lot of indigenous people die on their way to West. US government wanted the territories that Native people had been living for many many years even before got there. For me removal means extinction for Native people as their hunting grounds replaced with family farms and their tribal law replaced with the state law and I do not need to say it again that THEY WERE ONLY ALLOWED TO SPEAK ENGLISH. You see, it is only about who has the power to rule other people and in that case it is always the US white supremacy that decides who can do what.


    I remember in my American History class, we read an article that is about the white supremacists try to justify what they had done to Native Americans by basically saying that “Native people were barbaric because in their tribal wars, they killed their enemies, even cut their heads and hung it to their doors in order to show that they had their revenge.” I forget the name of the writer but he was right in his claims that white people say Native Americans liked wars and they were in conflict with each other in order to justify what they had done to them. Seeing Native people as barbaric should not give white people a right that they can blame those people because the conflict between Native tribes is something different than the pressure of white people because the US government caused many Native people’s death just to get a piece of land that belongs to Native Americans. For that reason, we should understand the distinction between the problems in Native tribes and the oppression of the government on the Native Americans. (I just wanted the mention about this issue as there are still some people who see Native Americans as “barbaric” but the main problem here is how Native Americans suffered as a result of the regulations that aim to assimilate their culture.)


    Assimilation is a problem for all races, ethnicities and cultures but the assimilation of Native American is the most problematic issue for me because we do not have many Native people still living today (I do not know the exact number population but I am sure there are not many) and that makes it not possible for us to learn everything we are curious about them. Personally, I am interested in Native culture and I wish we could have more things to study about them so that we could learn more about the history of them.


    -Tansu Özakman

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While it's true that we can't be totally accurate about what Native cultures were like before European contact, there is actually a large amount of knowledge about how things were before. Many of it comes from the oral history tradition, as well as the work of scholars who have studied old documents, paintings, artifacts and the stories of the people and we have a pretty good sense of those things were before the Europeans came. But this information is not widely disseminated, and certainly not very often beyond the borders of the USA. I wouldn't expect to find anything but movie stereotypes here in Turkey, for example (and I have seen so many of them here...stereotypes of Native peoples, that is)....

      Delete
  9. Thank you girls for your informative presentation, the video clips that we had watched was touchy.

    From the presentation and from the documentary that we had read, we learned about the different native tribes and there are three native tribes which are original indigenous governments, contemporary constituonal governments and finally transitional constituonal governments. Native Americans use their language as their representative of their native culture and American people did not seem as they like it.

    The most sad part of this documentary for me is that America trying to assimilate the Indian children by using the boarding schools. The video clip that we had watched about boarding schools is making people feel sad because they have been threated really bad and they have been forced to forget about their own language and forced to learn and speak english. Americans try to teach Indian people the "Euro-American" way and the aim of these boarding schools and trying to teach Indian children how to be an American with beating and punishing them when they had speak in their native language is unmerciful and sorrowful. The last video clip that we had watched was I think that most impressive video and it is an evidence that Indian people threated bad and it is a shame.

    “The Native Americans know that wolves are mirrors for humans. What they show us are our strengths and weaknesses... When I lived with the wolves, I was proud of the reflection of myself. But when I came back, I always paled in comparison.”
    ― Jodi Picoult, Lone Wolf


    Gözde İPEK

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Where'd you find that quote, Gözde? What do you think about it?

      Delete
  10. First of all, I would like to thank all the presenters. It was an informative presentation.

    Before this subject, I have never thought that Native-Americans is a subject for racism. Of course, in my American History class, we were informed about the difficulties they faced but never in detail. All in these courses (Introduction to American Studies and American History… etc.) which we talked about Native-Americans, we never know that we should not call them as Indians; while even before our college education most of us know that “negro” is not a proper name to call African-Americans.

    The most shocking information for me is the way of examining who is the real Native-American and who is not. Officers just look people’s appearance or cut people’s wrist to see the color of their blood and decide whether they are real or not. They are not based on a scientific foundation. Another important piece of information is 1887 Dawes Act. By this act, the government intended Native-Americans to have their own land instead of communal land. Therefore, the government gave a certain land for each head of Native-American and decided to sell the rest of it. By giving the less area for these people to live, the government would like to decrease their authority- power.

    Native-Americans have faced lots of problems throughout the history but I think the worst one was the problem of assimilation. After 13 colonies invaded and founded America, the US government wanted to make those people Americans by assimilation. Their motto was “Kill the Indian to save the man”. The government would like to change their language, religions, customs and appearances. Yes, assimilation is a big problem almost for all racist but especially for Native-Americans. For example, African-Americans. They did not really deal with the issue of assimilation; they were/are directly excluded from the society due to their skin color.

    These are just few problems Native-Americans have to deal with. We, even as students from the department of American Culture and Literature, do not know much about Native-Americans. Hope to learn more about them 

    Pınar ILGAR

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am curious about why your other courses haven't talked about indigenous history very much or the contemporary status of Native peoples...thanks for sharing. It's something I can bring up with the other faculty ;)

      Delete
  11. At the very moment Europeans discovered the Americas, they wanted to settle and to own the lands, and when I say the lands, I mean the entire continent. One problem : People were living there, for a long before they came. They had to deal with it. But how to appropriate lands that do not belong to you ?

    Thus Europeans stated first that Natives were not civilized enough and were obviously in need of civilization. They started to "teach them how to be civilized" and they succeded to a certain extent. In fact, certain tribes adopted several of the European cultural and technological practices. One of the best example to me is the Cherokee tribe which belonged to the so-called "Five Civilized Tribes" meaning that the process of acculturation worked well with them, so well that, I don't remember exactly, but years before The Trail of Tears, the US government passed an Act that allowed them to apply for the citizenship. And as we saw in the presentation, they tried (or faked?) to include the Natives as a whole in the US society. But again, the European being greedy as hell, Natives remained a problem, even the one considered as being now civilized (I dare to say that it is because of their non-being white - again!). They decided so to force the Natives to assimilate and the they simply pushed them to move away from European-populated areas by sending them (the Five Civilized Tribes included) to reservation camps, and we saw how they treated people there, how The Dawes Act granted them as less lands as possible. Everything is a question of propriety here, the white European saw the opportunity to take over the whole place and they acted accordigly to that purpose.
    The way minority groups are treated in the US (and through our nice planet) pissed me a lot, but not as much as the way Native are treated. Nobody belong to the US more than Natives, nobody is more American than a Native but, this so-called white supremacy grants the right to the US government to act as if the white settler is the true American here, to determine who is a Native and who is not, to steal their lands 'legaly'...

    Something is pretty obvious to me here, no matter how much Natives (and all the non-withe groups) are acculturated, integrated, assimilated, whatever, they will never be considered as true American citizens and so, they will represent, to a certain extent, a kind of threat for the society. That is why they were, are, and will be, so easily and unjustly discriminated by the society itself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, of course you can say "race"! That's what this is all about, of course. Native peoples are not free from various processes of racialization, they are just different and unique from the ways other minority groups have been racialized. And race is always linked to power, as you so elegantly re-framed it for us in your post. Thanks for sharing.

      Delete
  12. Thank you girls for your presentation.

    It is really sad how Native Americans are treated in their own land and how they are forced to assimilation which leads to their loss of culture, identity and language. As Native American languages die, their values and traditions which formulated their cultural spirit are forced to die as well. All they want for their children was to respect their elders, work hard, study in school, respect for nature and protect their values. Yet the government institutionalized a forced assimilation of Native Americans through Christianizing them, making them lose their own traditions, changing their clothes and forbidding speaking any Native language. With the loss of these traditional values and the languages, Native American communities and families are destroyed and they were left with social problems in their dysfunctional families. The obsession of U.S government about classifying minorities which stemmed from their desire of Native resources led to the destruction of Native American identity.

    One of the most serious examples for the forced assimilation was the Native American Boarding Schools which I’ve learnt from this presentation. These boarding schools aimed to eliminate the traditional Native American ways of life and tried to urge them mainstream American culture. Government forced these people to send their children to boarding schools. Native Americans needed to send their children to these schools because the government provided no other schools for them. These schools had many horrible effects on Native American students which lead them to lose their identity as a whole. The children were forced to cut their hair and change their traditional clothing as well as their Native names. Even their religion is forcibly replaced by Christianity. They were humiliated and taught to be ashamed of being Native American.

    White press described them as sub-human and savages who are needed to be civilized. They have been treated horrible throughout the history and they still try to gain ability to make decisions on their own today. They fight for lost rights and retain sovereignty. Native Americans reflect broader social culture with its long history which is needed to be respected by everyone. This forced assimilation of America’s first people into the “white America” must be stopped. The government should not interfere to their own decisions for their own families. The government, in short, must not have the power over their lives.

    Burcu Karatekeli

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We should also remember, that even when we learn about the historical atrocities committed against Native peoples in North America--they still survived and persist today, despite the historical legacies of trauma and social problems their communities face. Their cultures did not die; they have changed over time as all our cultures have. However, at times, Native peoples were forced into cultural changes that were damaging and traumatic.

      Delete
  13. Thank you ladies for this informative and detailed presentation about Native Americans.

    In my opinion this is a very sensitive topic. Since the Indian Removal, none of the rights of Native Americans are given back to them. They have lost their lands, houses and more importantly their connection to their spiritual link to nature they live in. They are put into reservations and expected to be happy there. The recognition of the tribes and what happens to them once they are recognized is a dead end discussion; because both of them are not beneficial for Native American tribes. They need to be recognized in order to live according to their traditions but then they are not eligible for benefits from the US. The State has left Native American reservations in a poor condition by not delivering health care, education and housing. According to an article I have read in Washington post, it is said that 43% of Native American live in poverty. The lack of money brings about other problems like drug addiction, crime and diseases. The US actually by living them in poverty, betray its history. They have taken lands from these people and now they are treating them as burdens in the country. It is also heartbreaking to see that children are being raised in this poor conditions and even losing faith to this country where their ancestors lived for many years. (Here is the article I am talking about: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/the-hard-lives--and-high-suicide-rate--of-native-american-children/2014/03/09/6e0ad9b2-9f03-11e3-b8d8-94577ff66b28_story.html)

    Americans saw assimilation as the only solution for this problem of Native Americans. They believed for a long time that they have the potential to be civilized and once they believe in Christianity and be assimilated into the American culture; they will no longer be a problem. That’s why the boarding schools have been set up. The belief was that if they started assimilating from an early age, they would be successful. The idea of paternalism was also very apparent here because American advocated themselves as bringing help to these people and Native Americans needed help from the Whites. However, what these schools did was beating children for speaking in their native tongue and standardizing the way they look. They did not teach them the American culture but actually they tried to create their standard American individuals out of Native American children. It is sad that these so-called ‘school’ resembled so much of the concentration camps. These children were not treated humanely. I believe that the consequences of this treatment were severe and they actually brought hatred of American culture into the hearts of these children. I realized that we did not talk about the closure of these schools. I searched about it and saw that the schools closed due to decline of the popularity of assimilation politics and the increase in the focus of Native American self-identity. Now, Native Americans have the right to open up their own schools in their reservations-but of course, if they have the money to do it.
    Still, I am thinking where do Native Americans fall in American racial system and could not come up with an answer. It is very strange that solely Native Americans were put into reservation camps and tried to be assimilated in such hard conditions. In my opinion there must be a respect for these tribes since they were the founders and the cultivators of this beautiful land in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A--that's a great article that you linked to in your post. It really helps complement our discussion by bringing the status of Native peoples back into the present to remind us not only that Native peoples DO still exist but also to inform us about some of the social problems they face as a result of the historical legacy of mistreatment by the US government. Thanks for sharing!

      Delete
  14. However "cool" they were, and however I like them, I still hate them for something. North America belonged to them, but it was not taken away from them. They have lost it. They did not lose it the white skinned people with the thunder sticks, they lost it to the in-fighting. You guys have talked about Iroquois League, but it comes so late, and it had so many problems with it. If at any one point, Native Americans treated white people like they treated different tribes, white people couldn't get a hold on North America, the so called invasion would be stalled at least 50 years without the Quaker footholds. And with this much time on their hands, Native Americans would have time to get together, set aside their differences and stand against the invasion of their lands.

    But NO, they had to fight with each other and trust Europeans of all people; the most vicious, most destructive breed of people this earth had ever seen. This reason alone keeps me from showing the current Native American pity, but hell if it doesn't let me hate the Current Americans all the more.

    Some people get taken aback when they hear me say "God, I hate America", and they think that I hate it for the usual reasons. But no, I hate it because of their narrow minded, redneckish, greedy and cruel outlook on the rest of the world. And I hate it because of the atrocities they had committed, many times, throughout history.

    There is a theory somewhere on the internet that states, any conversation on the internet, given enough time, will at one point mention Nazis. So here's my rant. I don't think that America was and is much different than Nazi Germany. I mean sure the methods are different, but the results are the same. Boarding schools might look like a weak comparison when compared to Auschwitz, but when we saw that short clip of a Native American describing his stay at a boarding school, hardly able to breathe, I was able to see the similarity. Guy lost his native tongue for fcks sake, how is that not fckd up? Irak with WMDs, Afganistan with its poppy fields (the half of the real reason by the way, the other half being russians), Vietnams the same. How is dropping napalm canisters on a village and burning everyone to the crisp any different burning Judaists in big ovens? I don't think it is but if America does anything right, it is marketing. We just tend to forget when we are offered a different, seemingly bigger story..

    Story of our lives people. Native Americans were the noblest of us all; their animalist and shamanistic life-style was the one closest to nature. And now they are grouping around casinos. Oh the irony.. 50 years and they will call themselves through the names of their casinos, not their tribes' and that would be the day that something inside me dies.. ugh grimm...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, we do have to be careful of positive racism that characterizes Native peoples as peaceful, happy, harmonious and "one with nature" in a Disney-esque conception that reduces the variation and complexity of Native cultures to simplified concepts that because Native peoples incorporated the natural world into their world view in a more holistic world, they are more noble than the rest of us, who have been corrupted by modernities evils. The truth lies somewhere in-between. Yes, Native worldviews are generally more holistic in their approach to Nature, but to reduce them that way is also to create a single story about Native peoples.

      I would disagree that the loss of land is the fault of Native peoples for not uniting enough or not fighting back hard enough. I think they were simply overpowered by things like foreign disease, guns, and different technologies and thoroughly different cultural and political systems that were often absolutely outside their world view. Anyway, hindsight is always 20/20, right? What matters is the history that we know and the policies we can examine and determine how the US federal government continued to intervene in the lives of Native peoples, placing them a specific path of racialization and identity-formation within the USA that has led to this current moment (of white supremacy, in my opinion....)

      Delete
  15. Thank you ladies for your informative presentation and striking videos.

    What Native Americans go through for ages is nothing but another story of "white civilized chosen Americans' " power struggle. ones again U.S government tries to assimilate, dominate another group of people according to their economic benefits. In other words, Native Americans are one of U.S Government's doughs that they think they can shape how they want according to their current economic benefits as they do other racial and ethnic groups in the America.

    During the presentation two things strike me more than other issues. the first one is blood quantum. If I learned U.S Government's unscientific way of deciding how much Native American blood one person has 2 weeks ago, I would have been shocked. However, after I have learned case of Ozawa in Ngai's article (I might confuse 2 cases we have learned) that the government did not recognize man's citizinship just because he did not look like as an avarage American, all excuses that U.S Government alleges are normal for me. They do not need scientific methods and so, they are so civilized, so wise that they can uderstand how much American, black or Native you are by just looking your appearence!

    The second one is idea of civilization. Especially who decide a person level of civilization. According to who and what its level is decided. I think it is called white privilege. American Government see Amerca and Americans (in their own definition) superior than all other nations, ethnicand racial groups and they try to civilize them with all their generosity. what they did to Native Americans with boarding school is unacceptable. They forced little Natives children to give up their language, traditions, beliefs, way of living and basically what they learned from their parents and they did it under the name of civilization. When I watch the video about boarding school especially the part that some man from the school saying we dress them up, we tought them languge, we civilize them, I remember one of the movies we have watched in Amer 304 course, "Beasts of the Southern Wild" the movie that Benh Zeithlin draws a picture of a group of people live seperated from "civilization" and achieve unity and peace. In that movie when officals find out their existence, they brought them to hospital, dress childrens up and try to educate them just like U.S government did to Native Americans in boarding school. In the movie "savages people achieved to escape and return their home to nature but in real life many native people had to suffer in these so called schools. It is amazing to see how a powerful group decide everything which crucially effects our lives, our ways of living, our languages. I mean we do not know maybe Natives people languages or ways of living is more civilized than our "modern civilization" but as I say before, white has privilege to decide that and they do.

    There are lots of thing to think and talk about these are the most striking points for me.

    By the way, Race and ethnic studies get more and more intresting and attractive for me since the topic is elaborated from Blacks and really enjoy study it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you only take away one thing from the course, I would be totally content if it's the idea that race in American is more than blacks vs. whites. Although we certainly still see that old tension played out right now in the protests being held about the treatment of African American young men by white police officers. Yet, if you can see that the story of America's racial past and present is more complex than a black/white binary....I will consider the class a success :)

      Delete
    2. I am aware of the importance of African American's history for understanding the U.S History and including our Black Power course with Dr. Brown, we only focus on African American's history in race studies except the very limited part about natives in Amer 207 in Prof. Demirturk's course for four years. And even then I am intrested to learn more about other racial and ethnic groups and I am happy to have that in your course.

      Delete
  16. First of all, thanks İlkim,İrem,Selen and Kardelen for their informative and great presentation. Also I want to thank all of you for your videos these were also very impressive and explanatory.
    In the issue of Native Americans again we see the America’s unfair manner to the different ones and differences also to the minorities. As the efforts of BIA, Native Americans got some rights but it is not really enough. In this presentation, the boarding school issue is the issue that impressed me most. Native Americans were forced to send their children to these boarding schools and forced to lose their identity. Besides this they forced to lose their culture and all other values. They are forced to forget about their values. They are even forced to change their shape of hair and their clothes. It is very weird, sad and humiliating situation for them. The strain of America about changing Native American’s religion and religious beliefs in other words America impose them Christianity and it is agonising for them and at the same time it is shameful for America. As they have not freedom in anything they have also many restrictions on “freedom of thought”. It is impossible to except thay they are free about protecting and maintain their own values their own identities,traditions and cultures whereas they don’t even have freedom to take decions about their lives about their way of lives. First of all it is psychologically very heavy and hard for the Native American parents not even have permission and freedom to decide and choose their children’s schools instead of the government of America. It is officially an opression because of they born as Native Americans and they born as a member of this minority. Shortly it is tyrannizing them for the reasons and for their rise or born as Native Americans which does not occur under their control and which is not the thing they chose which is given by God, their born as Native Americans is out of their control and restricted is that much, taking their freedoms in every area that much is not the thing they deserve and these are also not the things that they are forced to experience and suffer from.

    Özge Başak

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What strikes me from your response is how learning about the boarding experiences for Native peoples made such an emotional impact on you. I hear a lot of words and ideas that express your deep emotional reaction to this part of the USA's histories. While it is hard to teach about historical atrocities, I appreciate your ability to empathize with the subject matter and these people. Empathy can be a anti-racist strategy!

      Delete
  17. To begin with, thanks for the interesting presentation. The Skrillex video was a really good idea and the other video at the end, in which the man was crying while he was describing what he had to go through was heartbreaking to say the least. The things that the minorities have to go through in the hands of the American government are sometimes downright brutal. It does not necessarily have to be physical abuse for someone to be tormented throughout the rest of his/her life, but the procedures, the name-calling, the mocking of the way a person looks like, can really take a toll on someone's psyche until the day they die. Evidently, we can see in one of the videos, how even an elderly person can still recall those days while crying his eyes out. I mentioned in one of my comments during the presentation how the over-lasting effects of PTSD can be observed on these people. They and their generations to come, will never, ever forget what their ancestors and they had to go through just to survive in an unjust atmosphere. It's not just "oh, they took our land" but it's "they took our land, broke our spirits and smeared our culture and society with addictions that our future generations will perhaps, never be able to overcome". The actions of the United States government was an act to break the will, the fighting spirit of the Native-Americans. Just like they did with various other cultures and their people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What you are describing is how we think of colonialism in Ethnic Studies: not just the taking away of land or taking away the power of a people to govern themselves, but a complete and total colonizing of their minds and spirits. An even more dangerous weapon...

      Delete
  18. I want to thank İlkim, İrem, Kardelen and Selen for your presentation.

    The complex U.S. legislative system and its impact on the Native Americans’ social, cultural, economic and political policies is one of the issues that have been attempted to be solved, yet have not been achieved in an effective way.
    It is observed that the US government, have enacted different legislations for different racial and ethnic groups. This week, we focused on Native Americans. They have a unique status in the US. It is because they have constituted the indigenous population in the Americas. They witnessed colonization of the Americas by the Europeans and the foundation of the United States. These major changes, cultural exchanges, constructions and destructions dramatically affected their lives.

    I am fascinated by how Native Americans established their own constitutions and laws that inspired founding fathers while they were working on the US constitution. It is therefore ironic and contradictory that some of the early European settlers and observers labeled them as “savages”. As Wilkins and Stark argue European constitutions were not enough to form a democratic constitution alone. Native Americans were important role models on how to create a fair platform with various tribal groups.

    Another important point is that how Native Americans have become the aliens of their own territory. The scientists have been trying to find their origins. They create a perception that Native Americans do not belong to Americas like Europeans. So that Native Americans would not claim their right to be the owner of the Americas, in this case the US. From their view, they were immigrants that moved the continent from Asia or the lost continent so long ago. I do not find their argument convincing because I believe there have always indigenous people in the Americas and their existence do not have to be result of immigrations from other continents. The scientists approach corresponds to the practices of assimilation by Euro-American authorities. So that Native Americans should not grow attachment to their lands and ethnic identities. Native Americans have strong connection with their surrounding environments not only in concrete sense but also in spiritual way. Therefore, the US authorities tried to eradicate their values by disintegrating them from the society.

    As massacres towards Native Americans replaced with assimilation, the boarding schools gained importance. It is very painful to see how Native people were forced to adopt and adapt the WASP culture. Cultural exchange cannot be carried out through threats and enforcements in the name of civilization. I wonder what is the definition of civilization for those authorities? “Kill the Indian, Save the Man?” Is that the best method that you got, by killing people? And what makes you believe that you have the capacity for civilizing Native Americans? Why there is a need for Native Americans to be Europeanized or Christianized?

    In the videos that we watched during the presentation, I noticed that how Native Americans still feel the pain as they telling their education experience at the boarding schools. Their hair were cut. It must be very sad for them to live that as hair is an important of their identity. The treatment they receive was very cruel. They were not allowed to speak their own language. And language is the most important part of us. It is the way how we give meaning to things, communicate and once that is taken away from, we are not the same the person that we were.

    Hacer Bahar

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These two questions from your post seem really significant to me: " And what makes you believe that you have the capacity for civilizing Native Americans? Why there is a need for Native Americans to be Europeanized or Christianized? " By asking these questions, you are showing the operation of power relations between non-Native and Native peoples in the USA..

      Delete
  19. Thank you for the presentation, ladies.

    My first encounter with Native American culture was probably through a Western movie played on the national channel on a Sunday. My dad is the stereotypical Turkish dad who refuses to change the channel when it's his "cowboy movie" hour.

    But a few things bug me today as an AMER student. Not only virtually everyone in Turkey calls Native Americans "Kızılderililer" (translates as "redskins"), but they seem to treat them as mythical entities. Like they never actually existed, or magically disappeared somewhere in time. I can't blame them of course, because all their knowledge on Native Americans is based on old Hollywood productions.

    But what I saw when I watched the documentary on the Native American boarding schools (I *had to* watch the whole thing--didn't regret it at all) was that it's not very different, though not as bad, in the States either. Do we wonder what happens to the Indians after the movie ends? And what happens to their children? And their grandchildren? The documentary is straightforward in telling their story and is a great addition to Mary Brave Bird's article.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why and when did you watch the documentary on boarding schools, Esma? Was it just for this class or was it something covered in another class?

      Delete
  20. Thank you girls for your informative presentation

    First of all, this is a very sensitive and touching issue, the assimilation of the Native Americans. When we consider the issue in a very simple way, first the white came and pushed the Native Americans from their land, they killed, tortured, assimilated and killed their soul. It is possible to make a connection with the short story about the coyote and the ducks in Thomas King’s article. Feathers of the ducks are the land and the coyote is the white men who ask for feather by different tricks and more and more for each time. The aim of Native Americans assimilation worst level is the Boarding Schools. The idea of these schools is to “Kill the Indian and save the men”. Native Americans connection to land, to their culture is extremely strong in this case nothing worst could happen to them. In my opinion all these tortures for profit based reasons are inhuman.

    On the other hand, the US government used the Blood Quantum in order to make the Native Americans alien to themselves and get away their little rights left from them. The Blood quantum proofs how much Native American one is.

    Lastly, with The Dawes Act in 1887 also known as the General Allotment Act, The Native people lost more and more land that 2/3 of their land was lost. Their land was sold to white Americans or to the US government. Throughout the American history there were numerous treatments of assimilating, discriminating and breaking their connections with the land which is much more than a pace of soil for the Native Americans.

    Rabia Betul Kubilay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, great to go back to how King opens his essay with the allegory of the coyote and the ducks. How do you see that allegory played out in the history of Native peoples in the USA?

      Delete
  21. Thank you for presentation and I am sorry for not attending your first part of it.

    There are good interactions with the texts on the videos. Major part of the videos was the part that ilkim showed the video of a native man that talking about the boarding schools and it was really heartbreaking because it was REAL. So coming from that I love the materials on the blog post in addition to that boarding schoolot zs are in my view is similar to the Austswitch Nazi camps for me. As stated on the lecture the part that differ from it is one of them is physical and the other one is directing its focus to the assimilating and destroying the native culture to gain the total control. I really cannot diminish the difference among Nazi’s and American’s. Because there are not only the social reasons but there are several economic reasons, and those are more important. I do not want to sound like a redneck but American’s really took their jobs. As Reimer suggested there are fights among the natives but there are peace when it is the land they are dealing with. ( mostly ) So the catch in this is, they were self-sustaining units on the America but they were severed from their native land and they were severed in order to take control from them, only for the white supremacy. As far I cannot see the reason besides the melting pot, white supremacy and divine need to have rule the land, I cannot see the reason behind why people severed from their own native land, their sovereignty taken from them.
    My last comment will be on the last video of the presentation and it was really showing the major difference, he denies to speak English he denies to act like them, basically he denies American way of life and live his own life, because there is a real fact that being native is more important than being American to them. Their land was severed, their culture is suffering and their own way of life taken from them. As Prof. Reimer pointed out in lecture and from previous 207 class, they are still hanging on to their roots.
    Thank you.

    -Serhat BAŞAK

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sometimes I think the only truly American thing is white supremacy (which is not to say that others in other parts of the world and in different times and places haven't and don't practice it, but it does seem uniquely American to me). That and jazz.

      Delete
  22. It is obvious that the situation of Native Americans has become critical and controversial since the colonial period and after that. Indian Removal Act was a crucial moment in this sense. In one of his letters, Thomas Jefferson points out that, “ ….we were pursuing here for the happiness of the aboriginal inhabitants in our vicinities. We spared nothing to keep them at peace with one another. To teach them agriculture and the rudiments of the most necessary arts...” This clearly shows that the assimilation and removal process of Native Americans are tried to be “justified” by pointing out the fight between Native Americans. Intervention is demonstrated as the sole solution to end this fight between tribes. In other words, US benefited from the conflict seen in inner relations of Native Americans to justify its action and policies.

    Besides, as we analyze the sources from colonial period and after it, it is seen that Native Americans are described as “barbarian” and “uncivilized”. For instance, in the letters of Mary Rowlandson, colonial woman being captured by Native Americans, it is seen that strong ethnocentric perspective is adopted towards Native Americans. In other words, they are seen as inferior who desperately need to be civilized. At this point, US has been portrayed as a “hero” who would save Native Americans from this barbarian way of life by making them civilized. In other words, some paternalistic approach is adopted towards Native Americans. Boarding school became inevitable part of this assimilation process. At this point, I would like to say that I felt really bad as I read the article “Civilize Them With A Stick” and watched the video on Thursday in the class. It is really sad to think about the force that is used for children to make them so-called assimilated and hard conditions that they had to deal with. Besides, in the text the writer states that “It had such a bad effect upon me that I hated and mistrusted every white person on sight, because I met only one kind.” This shows that as as result of this kind of approach adopted towards children in boarding schools, how a new type of racism is created, whereas it is aimed to assimilate them.

    I do not like the message that the US has tried to give: “Native Americans need our care.” This emphasizes the paternalistic view that US government have. Every nation determines their own destiny, so, it is clear that Native Americans did not need US in this sense, and they will not in the future as well.

    Yasemin Öztemür

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As I mentioned in an earlier comment, I really appreciate it when you guys bring in knowledge and material from other courses to complement or challenge what we are learning in this course. It creates a great interdisciplinary dialogue for us. Keep it up!

      Delete
  23. Thank you Ilkim, Kardelen, Selen, and Irem for your informative presentation. I really liked the videos you guys used, well they were heart-breaking so I can't really say I enjoyed watching, but it was really interesting and important for us to hear the stories of people who actually experienced the tragedies resulting from the IRA and other new regulations white settlers started. I honestly think that the few sentences uttered by the Native American man in the last video you showed us said so much by saying very little, and his words were more powerful than any academic article or books that could be written about their situation. It is after witnessing these stories that you really lose it and say: Fuck these people and their messed up ideologies... Who are they to do this to other people who are in no way racially, culturally, and intellectually inferior to them?! These “savages” that needed to be “civilized” or “enlightened” were far more civilized and intelligent, in many areas, including their political systems and social life. Damn any belief or ideology that justifies the acts of crime they committed and continue to commit.. And it is through hearing these stories that we can feel anger and a strong urge to react and do something about similar situations going on in different parts of the world today.

    It is a sad truth but the best way to assimilate people is to get rid of anything that makes a community a community, their culture being the strongest building block that brings this community together. What forms a culture is the existance of a common language, history, religion and also shared customs and traditions, and it is through these elements that a culture can survive, thrive and pass down onto future generations. If these are lost than a whole culture is lost and so are the people themselves. Unfortunately, the ones who were in power were perfectly aware of this. This is how almost a whole population of indigenous peoples and their culture became history.

    In the text, we are informed about the numerous acts and policies that targeted Native Americans in order to take control of everything they had. This was done sometimes strategically by tricking them with unofficial agreements and treaties. They were either forced off their land by taking away their rights and ownership of land as it was in the case of the “Trail of Tears” or by gradually disconnecting them from their native culture and integrating them into the white American culture. The boarding schools for Native American children, as emphasized in the text, were built for this particular purpose. The children were forced to adopt white European Christian values from a very young age. They were educated according to Christian values, given new English names, and forced to speak only English in their daily lives. They were not allowed to speak their native tongue even among each other, and were mentally tortured if they were caught doing so or if they refused to adapt as was shown in the interview videos we watched during the presentation. They were outcasted and ridiculed if they refused to adapt or blend in. This social and emotional pressure was the key factor used to pull these young people away from their family heritage, make them forget about the culture they once belonged to, and cut their ties completely from their past.

    -Sera

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A very well-written re-cap of the main points of last week's material, Sera!

      Delete